• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Privacy Directory
  • Deplatforming
  • Services
    • Internet Privacy
    • Individual Reputation
    • Business Reputation
    • Social Media Privacy
    • Mugshot Removal
  • Resources
    • Online Privacy Videos
    • Online Security Tips
  • Contact Us

Internet Removal

The Source For Online Privacy

  • General News
    • Social Media Privacy
  • Facebook Privacy
  • Mugshot Removal
    • Mugshots.com Criminal Case
  • Phishing
  • People Finder
  • Voting Sites

Florida HB 677 – Mugshot Removal Bill

March 5, 2013

HB 677, Mugshot Removal Bill, Carl Zimmerman Bill, SB 1060

Finally, a Politician that understands Internet Privacy, Rep. Carl Zimmerman, D-Palm Harbor has introduced Florida HB 677, a Mugshot Removal Bill. With an Effective Date of October 1, 2013, the bill requires that operators of Mugshot Websites remove a person’s name & information within a specified period after notice that person is acquitted or charges are dropped or otherwise resolved without conviction. It provides for a civil penalty against Mugshot Websites in Florida and provides for presumption of defamation against Mugshot Website Owners.

Here is a list of some of the Mugshot Websites in Florida and their current removal policies.

  • Mugshots.com – This Mugshot website has been collecting and cultivating mugshot photos and arrest records for websites for many years. The owner of this website is rumored to be in Florida but their true identity is unknown to the Internet Privacy Community. They charge $399 for one mugshot, $798 for 2, $1,197 for 3 and $1,479 for 4. Even if the charges were dropped or not adjudicated, they charge these fees. They use to provide Removal Services, but in 2012, a new site www.unpublisharrest.com was launched. In some cases, the removal service company (a reseller of mugshots.com) asks for you to email or fax them the court records. After reviewing the court records emailed, they may elect not to remove the mugshot. This company use to provide a free service for lawyers for removal of cases that were expunged or dropped, but that service was terminated in 2012. Mugshots.com provides a link to Facebook.com for facebook users to comment on any mugshot photo/arrest record. The company’s domain is registered in Belize City, Belize. Mugshots.com’s IP Address 184.72.221.63 appears to be hosted by Amazon.com (216.182.224.79).
  • Florida.Arrests.org or Arrests.org – This company is owned by ex-con and entrepreneur Robert Wiggin of New Orleans, LA / Winter Park, Florida. There is no removal information on the website. The only contact information is the email address info@arrests.org. There are removal websites that allegedly remove the mugshots for $399. There is section for comments under each mugshot. The Domain is registered to a Carlos Diaz in the city of Panama, Panama. Their website appears to be hosted in Sweden (IP 178.16.212.2). Their email address is info@arrests.org.
  • Jailbase.com – This company publishes Florida Mugshots on its website. There is a subscription service for users for $29.95 per month with detailed arrest information. They appear to resell mugshot data. They remove the information after 90 days. They have a contact form to remove inaccurate information only, not arrest information that was expunged, or the charges dropped. The company is located at 303 E. Gurley Street, #478 in in Prescott, Arizona. Their Email address: jailbase.support@gmail.com.

We’ve seen some of the cries on the Internet by the Mugshot Removal Company owners from their probable Multi-Million Dollar Homes with multiple sports cars in driveway. We’ve hard about their claim about their First Amendment Rights and their excessive costs to unpublish records from their database. The fact of the matter is that to remove a record from a database is simply minutes, deleting a database entry and a photo. The more costly expense is scanning the photos and photo copying the arrest records from the thousands of county courts offices throughout the United States. Since many of these companies are going back 10 or more years to put this information on the Internet, that’s where the money is being spent.

The real problem we’ve seen is that these mugshot websites are engaging in “reputation blackmail” and “extortion”. They are hiding behind the lack of Internet Privacy Laws. These sites don’t have to publish their Company Address and Location so if you are going to litigate against them, you’ll have to find them. In addition, the Search Engines like Google, Microsoft Bing and Microsoft Yahoo index their content. Facebook allows them to link their content. Hosting Services like Amazon host their services. Some of these companies even have their servers located in other countries to shield themselves from litigation.

Editors Note: At InternetRemoval.com, we commend Florida Representative Carl Zimmerman, (D-Palm Harbor) on his support of this very important Mugshot or Internet Privacy Bill. We believe this bill is very important to protect the privacy of the Internet.

Reference
HB 677 – MyFloridahouse.gov
Mugshots.com Blog – HB 677

Filed Under: General News, Mugshot Removal Tagged With: carl zimmerman, hb 677, internet privacy, mugshot privacy bill, mugshot removal bill

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. BlogBlogger says

    March 17, 2013 at 2:40 pm

    INTERPOL
    http://www.interpol.int/Forms/Contact_INTERPOL
    Criminal Resource Manual 1663 – Protection Of Public Records and Documents. “The taking of a public record or document is prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 641.”
    DOJ. Retrieved from http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01663.htm

    18 USC § 1030 – Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
    (2) intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or exceeds authorized access, and thereby obtains—
    (C) information from any protected computer;

    18 USC § 641 — Public money, property or records
    Whoever embezzles, steals, purloins, or knowingly converts to his use or the use of another, or without authority, sells, conveys or disposes of any record, voucher, money, or thing of value of the United States or of any department or agency thereof, or any property made or being made under contract for the United States or any department or agency thereof;

    Whoever receives, conceals, or retains the same with intent to convert it to his use or gain, knowing it to have been embezzled, stolen, purloined or converted—

    18 USC § 1028A – Aggravated identity theft
    Whoever, knowingly transfers (steals), possesses, or uses (website), without lawful authority, a means of identification (mugshots) of another person shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such felony, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years.

    18 USC § 2319 — Criminal infringement of a copyright & 17 USC § 506 — Criminal offenses
    For the purpose of commercial advantage (website) and private financial gain (money).

    Governmental Prima Facie Evidence of name and likeness copyright:
    State Certified Birth Certificate, State Driver’s License, Passport and other government documents and records “created” to identify and validate name and likeness.

    18 USC § 2261A — Stalking
    (2) with the intent—
    (A) to kill, injure, harass, or place under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States; or
    (i) that person;

    18 USC § 1584 – Sale into involuntary servitude
    (a) Whoever knowingly and willfully holds to involuntary servitude or sells into any condition of involuntary servitude, any other person for any term, or brings within the United States any person so held, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

    Internet Spyware (I-SPY) Prevention Act of 2007
    “Intentionally obtains (steals/screen scraps), or transmits (internet) to another person information with the intent to defraud (unpublish/repair reputation).”

    18 USC § 875 – Interstate communications
    Transmits (internet) communication interstate (world wide web) with the intent to “injure reputation” to extort (unpublish/repair reputation).

    18 USC § 873 — Blackmail
    Whoever, under a threat of informing, or as a consideration for not informing, against any violation of any law of the United States, demands or receives any money or other valuable thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

    18 USC § 1962 – Prohibited activities
    (b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce.

    18 USC § 880 – Receiving the proceeds of extortion
    A person(s) who receives, possesses, conceals, or disposes of any blackmail (unpublish/repair reputation) money.

    Bizarre Logic and Reasoning
    If kidnappers called the ransom amount the returning person fee would it bedazzle the system again? Further, if the kidnappers rationalized their acts with the same logic would the system be mystified by them? Reasoning, they had to go through the hassle of kidnapping someone hence they are entitled to the returning person fee (Ransom Money).

    If blackmailers called the extortion amount the unpublish/reputation repair fee would it bedazzle the system? Further, if the blackmailers rationalized their acts with the same logic would the system by mystified be them? Reasoning, they had to go through the hassle of stealing government property, identity theft, stalking people, holding people to involuntary servitude, injuring their reputation, blackmailing them hence they are entitled to an unpublish/reputation repair fee (Extortion Money).

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Recent Posts

  • Congress Passes Take It Down Act
  • Is This Nonconsensual Intimate Imagery or Artwork?
  • iPhone Calendar Virus / Rogue Subscribed Calendar
  • Criminal Case: Mugshots.com Owners Charged with 51 Counts
  • Democratic Senators Introduce Bill to Repeal Section 230

Archives

  • May 2025
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • February 2021
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • February 2017
  • November 2016
  • June 2016
  • February 2016
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • March 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • March 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012

Categories

  • Business Privacy
  • Calendar Virus
  • Communications Decency Act
  • Company
  • Cyber Exploitation
  • Cyberstalking
  • Dating Sites
  • Facebook Privacy
  • Fake News
  • Featured News
  • General News
  • Google Search
  • Internet Privacy
  • iPhone Spam
  • Legal
  • Local Search
  • Mass Compromise
  • Mobile Privacy Tip
  • Mugshot Removal
  • Mugshots.com Criminal Case
  • Online Privacy
  • Online Security Tips
  • People Finder
  • Phishing
  • Privacy
  • revenge porn
  • Right To Be Forgotten
  • Section 230
  • Social Media Privacy
  • Stalking
  • Take It Down Act
  • Telemarketing
  • Telemarketing – Robocalls
  • Uncategorized
  • UnpublishArrest.com
  • Voting Site Removal

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Internet Removal Privacy Directory

About Us · Terms · Disclosure · Privacy · Contact Us

www.InternetRemoval.com · 1-888-591-9828

Copyright 2012-© 2025